* For more on this case, click here in the Blog’s archives. Pure Storages renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law (JMOL) or, in the. Most relevant lists of abbreviations for JMOL - Judgment as a matter of law. JMOL is similar to judgment on the pleadings and summary judgment, all of which test the factual sufficiency of a claim. The bar exam, so the saying goes, is like fording a. Similar to summary judgment, the party moving for JMOL asks the court to rule in its favor without a jury because the law and evidence so clearly favor the moving party. A party can move for JMOL after the adversary presents its case at trial. Judge Kennelly denied defendants James Gordon’s (“Gordon”) and Mach 1’s motions for judgment as a matter of law (“JMOL”) and entered an injunction against Gordon’s and Mach 1’s continued use of the copyrighted pictures at issue – pictures of a parachutist and a sniper used in motivational posters. Gordon and Mach 1 argued that the jury’s verdict that Gordon and Mach 1 infringed plaintiff’s copyrights was inconsistent with the jury’s verdict that defendant John Urtis (“Urtis”) – who took the infringing sniper photo – did not infringe plaintiff’s copyright. But the Court held that JMOL cannot be used to harmonize jury verdicts. Furthermore, the Court held that the infringement verdicts were supported by the facts.īecause of a threat of continued infringement, the Court granted a permanent injunction against Gordon and Mach 1. But the Court held that it could not issue the injunction against Urtis because the jury’s verdict was in Urtis’s favor. The Court did, however, caution Urtis not to aid the other defendants in violating their injunction. Judgment as a matter of law (JMOL) is a motion made by a party, during trial, claiming the opposing party has insufficient evidence to reasonably support its case.JMOL is also known as a directed verdict, which it has replaced in American Federal courts. Sixth Circuit Practice Tip: You Can’t Renew a Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law Never Made in the First Place. by uslawessentials In the federal courts, JMOL is governed by Rule 50. Gordon, _F.Supp.2d_, 2007 WL 2440208 (N.D. A judgment as a matter of law (JMOL) is a judgment entered by a court during judicial proceedings, based on a finding that the opposing party has failed to.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |